Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Conservative party leader David Cameron arrives by bicycle at the House of Commons in central London
Conservative party leader David Cameron arrives by bicycle at the House of Commons in central London Photograph: Lewis Whyld/PA
Conservative party leader David Cameron arrives by bicycle at the House of Commons in central London Photograph: Lewis Whyld/PA

David Cameron should be applauded for his topless bike ride to work

This article is more than 14 years old
Tory leader comes under fire from head injury and accident prevention charities after riding without a helmet

Some might argue that there are plenty of reasons to dislike - or disapprove of - David Cameron. I couldn't possibly comment. But cycling without a helmet? For me, that's just not one of them.

Within - seemingly - half an hour of Cameron being photographed this morning pedalling from his London home to the House of Commons, wearing a reflective belt but insouciantly bare-headed, the criticism began.

The Conservative leader should have been "setting a good example" by wearing a lid, the head injuries charity Headway said. "We are deeply disappointed," a spokesman said. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents also weighed in, saying it always encouraged cyclists to wear helmets.

Now, I have a couple questions about Cameron's ride to work this morning. Firstly, why hang the unused helmet from the handlebars? Is he planning a few pints later and wants to play it safe on the commute home? Plus, why is one of his bike escorts wearing what looks like 1970s-style skateboard safety gear (check out the retro elbow pad)? But when it comes to the bare head, plus everyday-looking clothes, I have no quibbles.

I've heard the for-and-against arguments over helmets more times than I care to remember. I wear a lid more or less every time I get on a bike, a habit that makes me feel exposed whenever I am cycling topless. But I'm resolutely against any moves towards compulsion, even of the guilt-based, you-should-set-an-example-to-others sort.

It was only last month that Jersey passed a law making it compulsory for all under-18s to wear helmets when cycling, in my view an absurd piece of legislation.

Here's Roger Geffen from the national cyclists' organisation CTC, who puts the arguments better than I ever could:

The idea that it is somehow 'dangerous' and 'irresponsible' to cycle without a helmet is a total myth. It merely puts people off cycling and contributes to the increase in the level of obesity and other inactivity-related illnesses, which kill tens of thousands of people every year. If we are to encourage people to take up cycling – with all its benefits for our health, our streets, our environment and our wallets – then we need to promote it as a safe and enjoyable way to get around for day-to-day travel, wearing normal clothes.

This isn't something you're likely to hear very often from Guardian any other time during the election, and I stress it's a single issue-only accolade, but here goes: three cheers for Cameron.

Comments (…)

Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion

Most viewed

Most viewed