Curating South Asia - Guggenheim Blogs
VENICE
N E W YO R K
support
visit
http://blogs.guggenheim.org/map/curating-south-asia/
calendar & events
BILBAO
about
exhibitions
CO M M UN I TI ES
BLOGS
I N T E R N AT I O N A L
EXHIBITIONS
ABU DHABI
collections
AUDI O
V I DEO
education
O N L I N E F O R UM
interact
B LO GS
GUGGENHEIM UBS MAP
October 1, 2012
GUGGENHEIM
F O U N DAT I O N
press room
PART I CI PAT E
E- CA R DS
shop
E-N EWS
ARCHIVE
| PERSPECTIVES | SOUTH/SOUTH EAST ASIA
Curating South Asia
25
Like
BY IFTIKHAR DADI
At its best, curating is an intellectual and social passion, but it is also a “profession,” in
the sense that any successful curatorial intervention requires interaction with physical
and mental ecologies and infrastructures. Curators must ascertain and negotiate the
2
availability of art-historical research; gain access to artifacts and archives; understand
the conditions of display spaces such as museums, galleries, and public arenas; canvass
10
patronage; envision the publics being addressed; and navigate considerations of legality,
social permissibility, and free speech. In South Asia, however, all these fields of endeavor
are still at an early stage of formation. Ideally, curating should not be confined within the
existing limits of such structures—or simply make use of them—but also contribute to
their development.
South Asia constitutes one of the largest populations on the planet, and is significantly
uneven and diverse in its social formations. Dozens of languages are used, numerous
religious and vernacular practices prevail, and there are gross, persistent, and perhaps
worsening disparities in wealth, education, and access to resources. The region faces
tremendous political and imaginative challenges in envisioning itself as a shared
geography in which exchanges of peoples, ideas, and goods are routine. It also has a
sizeable and growing diaspora, scattered across the world, which increasingly cannot be
conceived of as being separate from “home” in a globalizing world.
These conditions certainly pose a daunting challenge to curators, but precisely because
their profession remains in flux as far as South Asian art is concerned, intelligent
curatorial practice can also act as a powerful agent for positive change. Much has
happened during the last two decades in the South Asian region, but considerable work
remains ahead. Outlined here are just a few of the key challenges and opportunities.
State/Region/Diaspora
By virtue of its size, relative political stability, growing internal and external patronage,
and other institutional developments, the curating of modern and contemporary art in
India has blossomed in recent years. Public and private museums1 and good commercial
galleries provide curators with exhibition venues, journals and magazines help fashion a
critical discourse, and degree programs and workshops train scholars, artists, and
curators2. A new generation of curators has emerged in India, and curating is now
considered a serious and competitive profession3. India also overshadows other South
Asian countries in its international exposure, its artists and curators having recently
enjoyed more opportunities to exhibit both domestically and internationally.
Other countries however are also developing analogous infrastructures including
museums, galleries, journals, training programs, and periodic exhibition platforms such
as biennials4, and are beginning to garner increased international attention as a result.
These initiatives promise to establish curating as a reputable and influential practice
throughout the region. During the past few years, international curators have
collaborated productively with local artists and intellectuals to create an array of
interesting projects, and it seems likely that this will continue. Over the next decade,
1 of 4
12/7/13 5:01 PM
Curating South Asia - Guggenheim Blogs
http://blogs.guggenheim.org/map/curating-south-asia/
obstacles notwithstanding, we can thus expect to see the birth of numerous innovative
curatorial initiatives across South Asia.
During its long history, South Asia has seldom possessed political unity or social
uniformity, but the crystallization of the nation-state model during the twentieth century
has created new dominant realities that are immensely significant. In many ways, the
South Asian artist’s status as “national” figure remains key to situating her formative and
ongoing concerns. However, the very supremacy of the nation-state has also led to the
constriction of intellectual and imaginative horizons. It has elided numerous regional and
transnational connections that have been historically active, and which survive in
diminished or transformed ways today. The spread of fashion and pop-media imagery is
just one visible example of such exchange in the contemporary era.
In this regard, nonprofit initiatives such as the Triangle Network (Britto in Bangladesh,
Khoj in India, Theerta in Sri Lanka, and Vasl in Pakistan) are active not only in developing
local artistic and curatorial initiatives, but also in linking peoples and ideas in innovative
ways across South Asia. Also, the South Asian diaspora is enormous in cities such as
Dubai, London, and New York. Curatorial initiatives in these places have also been
instrumental in reconceiving South Asia beyond the restrictions of national borders. By
proposing a deeper and broader model of South Asia in major international venues, these
initiatives also contribute new ideas to domestic curatorial agendas5.
Publics
South Asia’s publics form a fractured palimpsest; the misconceived image of the region’s
citizenry as an undifferentiated mass ignores all the complexities of society and self.
Through classificatory technologies, colonialism in the nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries reformulated traditional communities and established new hierarchies and
subjectivities in place of those it inherited. The independent nation state has generated
new social groupings since the mid-twentieth century, but this top-down process has
been contested and redirected by major transformations on the ground such as hyperurbanization, and the claims of marginalized peoples for justice and representation
(appeals routinely suppressed by state violence).
Publics are thus crosshatched by the conflicting demands of languages, castes, and
genders, regional variations and class divisions, and, above all, by their varying abilities
to achieve recognition and voice. Thus it is no accident that a large and sophisticated
body of scholarship on the subaltern has emerged in South Asian historiography, a
category encompassing the historical and contemporary issue of the visibility,
marginality, and representation of individuals and communities as subjects of history.
How does this pertain to curating? Simply put, the practice cannot adopt a fixed
perspective that presents an abstracted nation-state as the sole viable framework, since
to do so would obscure other important perspectives. There is a pressing need to rethink
curatorial agendas, and to focus on creative approaches designed to illuminate neglected,
suppressed, and emerging relations. These might include the exploration of subnational
and transnational spatial conceptions, and the forging of a nuanced understanding of how
new forces (such as accelerated urbanization and pervasive electronic media piracy) are
transforming our sense of belonging. Curators will also need to foreground the problems
of subalternaity and marginality in order to frame appropriate agendas. Contemporary art
and curating should actively seek to fashion new publics comprised not simply of extant
connoisseurs, but also of those presently marginal to its address.
Art/Popular
From the perspective of postcolonial studies, master categories such as art are marked
by catachresis, in that they do not quite possess an adequate referent; the South Asian
context impels us to continuously question what is meant by the term. To be more
specific, South Asia, which has historically been a major site of artisanal work and the
courtly arts, was transformed during the colonial era by the founding of formal art
education. Since the early twentieth century, the idea of art as a modern practice with
associated discourses and institutions has been well established. This conception is
characterized by individual subjectivity and bolstered by, for example, the circulation of
art objects through a gallery system. The ambiguity of art as an umbrella term to refer to
very different types of artifacts of modern art, craft, and courtly and religious objects, is
only one instance of this conceptual puzzle.
2 of 4
12/7/13 5:01 PM
Curating South Asia - Guggenheim Blogs
http://blogs.guggenheim.org/map/curating-south-asia/
The discourses and practices of modern and contemporary art play out against the
backdrop of the “popular.” In South Asia, the latter domain is immense, and constitutes a
number of overlapping fields existing in productive tension and collaboration with each
other. It encompasses tribal, folk, and artisanal practices6, incorporates diverse media
and methods, and embraces “bazaar arts,” including religious and secular posters and
other street-based forms. It also gestures toward widespread and continuous grass-roots
social and political mobilization. The relation between high art and popular visual culture
in South Asia is multiply determined, and cannot be reduced to theoretical dualities such
as elite and kitsch, or to conceptions of the postmodern formulated in the context of late
capitalism.
Art as a formation remains in dynamic engagement with the popular, a chaotic force that
is nonetheless all-too-frequently excluded from curatorial visions. While it is perfectly
legitimate to focus on “professional” artists and their work when organizing a specific
exhibition or project, a deeper understanding of the interconnected forces that surround
them may help guard against any perception of contemporary art as either failing to
represent society at large, or as representing it completely. There is a wider world
beyond the gallery and, ideally, a curatorial project should provide some sense of how art
can be meaningfully situated in relation to these broader issues—even when the mandate
and setting of any exhibition is necessarily circumscribed.
Knowledge/Research
In order to contribute to cultural value, curating needs to be firmly conceived as
research, and aimed at creating new knowledge and new perspectives. Artistic practice in
South Asia and its diaspora is vibrant and active, but scholarly attention to its multiple
meanings tends to lag behind. Much artwork is appreciated largely as spectacle, and
“star” international curating has an egregious tendency to assemble shiny, superficial
objects and images into hastily conceived and ultimately flavorless mega-exhibitions of
“global” contemporary art.
Curatorial research encompasses the careful delineation of artistic location, trajectory,
and intent. It also includes the responsible situation of individual practices and works
within larger frames of meaning beyond artists’ own consciously formulated programs.
Curating must explore neglected perspectives such as the fraught relationship between
tradition, modernism, and contemporary art; the intellectual milieu in which the work is
made and received; and the importance of travel, diaspora, and cultural exchange in the
production of “national” art. South Asian curating in particular needs to experiment with
exhibition and project platforms as ways to spark new spatial and communicative
interaction. Individual projects should be conceived of not only as stand-alone events,
but also as contributions to a larger body of exploration. To consolidate the status and
influence of their field, curators must also commit themselves to institution-building and
archival development, and to the promotion of scholarly collaboration via symposia,
catalogs, websites, and workshops, making these and other elements key to any given
project.
—Writer, curator, and artist Iftikhar Dadi, Ph.D, is an associate professor in Cornell
University’s Department of History of Art and Chair of its Department of Art.
1. Collectors are also becoming actively involved in shaping curatorial agendas. For example, the New
Delhi-based Devi Art Foundation has mounted numerous exhibitions—including “national” shows focused on
Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Iran—and has invited curators from India and abroad to produce them. ↩
2. University programs training researchers and curators include the graduate level School of Arts and
Aesthetics at Jawaharlal Nehru University. Private research initiatives include The Foundation for Indian
Contemporary Art (FICA). ↩
3. A special issue of Take on Art magazine, vol. 2, no. 1 (2011), focused on curating exemplifies this trend. ↩
4. Examples include the Colombo Art Biennale in Sri Lanka and the Chobi Mela International Festival of
Photography in Bangladesh. ↩
5. See, for example, the numerous projects developed by Green Cardamom, an arts organization that at the
time of writing was based in London but has since relocated to Hong Kong. ↩
6. Jyotindra Jain’s work has been exemplary in foregrounding the problem of situating tribal and folk art in
contemporary art contexts. ↩
PREVIOUS
Interview with June Yap
3 of 4
NEXT
Southeast Asia: Art History, Art Today
12/7/13 5:01 PM
Curating South Asia - Guggenheim Blogs
http://blogs.guggenheim.org/map/curating-south-asia/
★
0 comments
1
Start the discussion…
Best
Share ⤤
Community
Login
WHAT'S THIS?
ALSO ON GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM
100 Urban Trends: Mumbai Mills
How the Guggenheim Got Its Visual Identity
3 comments • 5 months ago
4 comments • 2 months ago
Avataryak yakker — Having thoroughly enjoyed Taj Mahal
Foxtrot, much looking forward to your new book's
release. . .
AvatarCaitlin Dover — Thank you for the kind words,
Aloyse!
TBC: Finding a Suburban Future
Genius Loci: Session 2
2 comments • 2 months ago
3 comments • 2 months ago
AvatarCaitlin Dover — Thanks for the film recommendation
and thoughtful comment, Patricia. These are definitely
crucial issues to …
AvatarJude Broughan — Further to Jeff’s image of each of us
occupying “our own personal umwelt,” I wonder if it
might be worth considering certain …
✉
Subscribe
d
Add Disqus to your site
Website © 2013 The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation (SRGF). All rights reserved.
4 of 4
12/7/13 5:01 PM