in ,

Salò

1975

‘…the numbing, discomforting experience of watching Salò used to be a warning about the grim past remembered by our parents and grandparents; in 2023, it’s a unflinching promise about the way that we’re currently headed…’

Not very festive to review Pasolini’s uber-controversial 1975 film as the holiday period commences, but maybe this is the apposite time to enter the debate. Although it’s out in the US this week, I’m firmly embargoed from writing about Jonathan Glazer’s adaptation of Martin Amis’s The Zone of Interest until far-off Feb 2024. I was an admirer of Glazer’s Sexy Beast and Birth, less so his abruptly truncated adaptation of Michael Faber’s Scottish sci-fi novel Under the Skin. So don’t take it from me; you can read in plenty of sources elsewhere that The Zone of Interest depicts the well-documented domestic bliss of Commandant Rudolf Höss and his wife Hedwig and their five children as they live in luxury in the shadow of the Auschwitz concentration camp, their own hard-scrabble existence punctuated by the shouts of screams, gunshots and unseen, belching ovens.

Depicting the effects of fascist dictatorships, or not, has been one of cinema’s most problematic ambitions; Shoah and Schindler’s List were correctly seen as key texts, but whatever lessons we might learn from them seem to have been swept away by the trend towards the monetised hate-speak of professional anti-Semite Elon Musk and others. Pasolini’s brother had joined and fought for anti-fascist forces and was killed back in 1945 by the Brigate Garibaldi. The Italian director made Salò on the back of his vivacious Trilogy of Life films, and was intended to be the first of Pasolini’s darker Trilogy of Death. A straight depiction of what happens when fascism takes over, Salò shows teenage boys and girls rounded up, tortured, raped and murdered over a four-month period of sexual violence for the entertainment of the patriarchy who have gained power over them.

If Glazer wisely decides to depict nothing about what happened in Auschwitz, Pasolini goes the other way and depicts the sadism and the cruelty in extreme detail; his reward for his conscience was to be brutally murdered weeks before Salò was released. The numbing, discomforting experience of watching Salò used to be a warning about the grim past remembered by our parents and grandparents; in 2023, it’s a unflinching promise about the way that we’re currently headed. Our leaders warn of immigrants ‘poisoning the blood of our country’ and there’s plenty of us happy to go along, to focus on our domestic situation like the Höss family and try to pretend we don’t hear the disturbing noises off. In Europe, the bomb craters and war memorials still remind us of how fresh the wounds are, but the point has been forgotten; today’s crowds don’t chant about freedom or independence, but ‘burning the empire’, defiance in the face of encroaching, deadly fascism.

Most inherently conservative viewers will ignore films like Salò or The Zone of Interest; they’re too upsetting to be considered part of our evening’s escapist entertainment, confirming our gradual realisation that monetising hate is nothing new; Höss lives in a world of personalised pay-rates and incentives to gas as many innocents his superiors deem to be poisoning the blood of his country. In a world contorted by manufactured hate, films like Salò are made impossible for us to see, lest we remember why they existed in the first place. But the world they warned us about, of cheating, of lies and of greed and murder, is still here and ready to make the banality of evil stick next time around.

Comments

Leave a Reply
    • No, I’m not singled out. Unless I strike a separate deal with disturbs or film-makers, I review WOR which means week of release. That means I can’t express an opinion about Zone of Interest until Feb, but recapping Salò gives me a chance to spotlight it without comment.

  1. Pretty difficult watch as I recall. Wouldn’t rush back to see it again. I holiday in Gardone once in a while and everywhere you go you see plaques telling you this building was once the Nazi hospital or the Nazi HQ.

    • I love Italy, and I find it hard to reconcile that the same country was on the wrong side of WWII, and that such atrocities took place. This is strong meat, and has an edge that today’s exteme films lack because it’s firmly based on real events…traumatic, and only recommended to those who know exactly what they’re getting…

  2. It’s such a tough unpleasant film to endure, but vital to watch at least once, I think. As is Zone of Interest. I agree that the small minded bigots who need such a reminder will never watch either, but I felt Zone of Interest has a message for its likely audience – we are all complicit in our comfortable passivity if we don’t speak up against the increasingly alarming, pseudo-fascist rhetoric we often hear and that signal an impossible future (I appreciate you’re bound not to comment on Glazer’s film).

    I don’t know who Pasolini’s contemporary target audience was. Was it to rub Italy’s face in the shit of the recent past, a warning of the future, or something else? It certainly expresses a profound and very queasy horror, it’s more of an experience than a film, and a sickening one at that. The Death trilogy is new information to me – if Salo was the curtain raiser I shudder to think what would have followed.

    • I shudder to think. I’ve really delved into Pasolini’s death and what was going on around him. It feels murky. The political background is brutal, and he directly exposes the corruption of the past. There were plenty of directors with extravagance in their personal lives who didn’t the end up killed the way he was. The kidnapping of the film seems to be unclear, and I may have missed some nuance of what I’ve been told. I interviewed Laura Betti and the content left the translators ashen faced. I got the impression that he knew what was coming; the Dafoe film is worth anyone’s time.

      • I’d be interested to see that Laura Betti interview if it’s available online. I’d like to delve deeper into Pasolini. I’ve seen several of his films but he’s still a bit of a mystery to me. The Willem Dafoe / Abel Ferrara film is really good. I caught it at the cinema and I suppose it’s a niche topic but it seems like it should have been more widely seen.

Leave a Reply

Loading…

0