Anti-aircraft installations of the family ZU-23 / 30М1

43
It is no secret that regular and timely modernization of weapons and equipment can significantly extend their service life without serious losses in performance and efficiency. In addition, some small and poor countries simply do not have the opportunity to purchase a completely new weaponthat makes them look for ways to upgrade existing equipment. A few years ago, a new project for upgrading the anti-aircraft unit ZU-23 was created in Russia, which should have interested domestic and foreign customers.

Project ZU-23 / 30М1-3 and its version ZU-23 / 30М1-4 were developed by the Podolsk Electromechanical Plant PEMZ Spetsmash. The aim of this project was to create a new version of the obsolete anti-aircraft system ZU-23, suitable for operation in modern conditions. It was proposed to equip the basic anti-aircraft installation with a set of new equipment designed to automate various processes and enhance combat performance. The family of modernized anti-aircraft systems received the general designation ZU-23 / 30М1. At the same time, however, the family currently consists of only two installations - ZU-23 / 30М1-3 and ZU-23 / 30М1-4. Information about the existence of systems with indexes "1" and "2" is missing.


Anti-aircraft gun ZU-23 / 30М1. Photo Arms-expo.ru


An important feature of the ZU-23 / 30М1 family of projects is the architecture of the proposed upgraded anti-aircraft system. As a basis for the new technology, the base ZU-23 is used with minimal design changes. It is mounted on a set of additional equipment designed to enhance the characteristics of the basic system. The structure of the new equipment includes mechanical drives of guidance, control systems, optoelectronic equipment, etc.

The basis of the design of the ZU-23 / 30М1 family of systems is a platform with wheel travel and supports. In the stowed position, the installation rests on two wheels and should be towed by automobile or other equipment. Upon arrival at the position, during preparation for combat work, the installation is lowered onto three outrigger supports located in the corners of the main platform. The wheels at the same time rise and hang above the ground.

On the main platform there is a turning mechanism on which the upper platform with the artillery unit, command and control equipment and the operator’s workplace is located. The overall architecture of the aggregates of the upper platform as a whole remained the same, however, it underwent some changes directly related to the addition of new hardware. In the center of the platform are two automatic guns with vertical guidance systems. Behind them on the left there is the operator’s workplace with a set of necessary controls and systems for monitoring the operation of the installation. To the right of the operator are boxes with other equipment.

Anti-aircraft installations of the family ZU-23 / 30М1
Anti-aircraft gun ZU-23 / 30М1-4, rear view. Photo Pemz-podolsk.ru


The artillery part of the ZU-23 installation is not converted when it is converted to ZN-23 / 30М1-3 or ZN-23 / 30М1-4. As the main means of attack of air and ground targets, two automatic guns 2А14 of caliber 23 mm are used. The guns use vapor control automatics and are capable of firing at a rate of up to 800-1000 shots per minute each. The total rate of two guns - up to 2000 shots per minute. 2А14 cannons use 23х152 mm projectiles. To date, several variants of such ammunition have been created: various operators can use both Soviet-made BZT armor-piercing and incendiary projectiles and other foreign-made shells. In two boxes, located on the sides of the guns, 100 shells are placed.

When upgrading to the ZU-23 / 30М1 state, to the right of the guns, a block of optical-electronic equipment is installed on the right-hand bracket for detecting targets, capable of swinging in a vertical plane with the tools. The unit includes a video camera and a thermal imager, which allows the operator to observe and attack the detected targets at any time of the day and in any weather conditions. The video signal of the optoelectronic system and other information are displayed on a monitor installed at the operator’s workplace.


Optoelectronic unit. Photo Pemz-podolsk.ru


An important feature of the modernization projects ZU-23 / 30М1-3 and ZU-23 / 30М1-4 was the use of electric drives of the guidance system. The system operator retains the possibility of manually pointing the guns, however, special electric motors are used as the main method of changing the pickup angle. These mechanisms are controlled by two handles on the operator’s console located under the monitor. They also have shooting control buttons.

The composition of the anti-aircraft equipment of the ZU-23 / 30М1 family includes a computing device that is responsible for the operation of the unit in semi-automatic and automatic modes. The new electronics allows the operator to detect airplanes and helicopters at a distance of up to 8 km, which is significantly higher than the sights of older models. The developer declared the possibility of pointing guns in manual, semi-automatic and automatic modes. All these modes differ in the distribution of various tasks between the operator and the automation. So, there is the possibility of automatic tracking of the target and the calculation of pre-emption with control of the guidance mechanisms. It is argued that the use of new equipment allows an order of magnitude increase in installation efficiency.

For power supply of new electronic equipment on installations of the ZU-23 / 30М1 family, existing batteries or an external source can be used. In the latter case, the position should be placed generator of suitable power or any other equipment of similar purpose.


The control panel and bracket for mounting the launcher for missiles. Photo Pemz-podolsk.ru


The main difference between the ZU-23 / 30М1-4 system and ZU-23 / 30М1-3 is an extended list of equipment and armaments. Such a modification is equipped with an additional missile control panel, as well as a launcher for man-portable air defense systems. The installation provides mounting for mounting two transport-launch containers of Igla missiles or similar systems. The search for targets and preliminary guidance of missiles is carried out using the existing optical-electronic system. Automation is able to determine the parameters of the target and advise the operator on the use of barreled or rocket weapons. After launch, the missiles are induced independently.

Modernization with the use of new equipment allowed keeping some characteristics at the same level, as well as increasing a number of other parameters. When using anti-aircraft guns, shelling is carried out at ranges up to 2500 m and at altitudes up to 1500 m. The design of the anti-aircraft system allows firing in any direction with elevation angles from -5 ° to + 80 °. The drives used can direct guns in a horizontal plane at speeds up to 60 degrees per second and at speeds up to 45 ° per second in verticals. Reaction time, according to the developer, does not exceed 6 with. Perhaps firing at targets moving at speeds up to 400 m / s. Maximum shooting efficiency is achieved at target speeds no more than 200 m / s.


Operator console and launcher MANPADS. Photo Arms-expo.ru


Anti-aircraft gun ZU-23 / 30М1-4, equipped with missile weapons, has great characteristics of destruction in range and height. The Igla and Igla-S missiles make it possible to hit targets at a distance of up to 6 km and altitudes up to 3,5 km. The speed of the effectively hit target in this case reaches the 400 m / s. After the shooting of the two missiles available on the launcher, the installation of new containers takes no more than a few minutes and is carried out by calculation forces.

If necessary, upgraded anti-aircraft installations can be used to attack ground targets. In this case, the fire is conducted with a minimum angle of elevation of the trunks. The maximum range of destruction of ground targets, depending on their type, corresponds to the range of firing at air. At the same time, however, the effective firing range directly depends on the type of target. Thus, an unprotected vehicle can effectively be hit over the entire range of distances, whereas armored vehicles should attack at a shorter distance. In addition, the effective range for armored vehicles depends on the type of shells used.

According to reports, anti-aircraft installations of the ZU-23 / 30М1 family can operate as part of batteries. In this case, the operator manages one installation with a complete set of equipment and interacts with several similar systems in a simplified configuration. The operation of such a battery is controlled by the operator who monitors the air situation and determines the targets for the attack. The automatics of the “main” installation in such a case can issue target designation and commands to other installations that have only pointing drives and fire control systems. Such a mode of operation can combine up to four anti-aircraft installations in a single structure: one “master” and three “slaves”.


Anti-aircraft gun ZU-23 / 30М1-4 with missiles. Photo Pemz-podolsk.ru


The company-developer offers customers a whole range of tools designed for the full operation of the upgraded anti-aircraft installation. In addition to the towed units ZU-23 / 30М1-3 or ZU-23 / 30М1-4, this complex includes a maintenance machine, a set of spare parts tools, and training systems for training operators. There is also information about the creation of a special support platform, which allows you to mount an anti-aircraft installation in the back of any suitable truck.

In the basic towed version, anti-aircraft installations of the ZU-23 / 30М1 family are serviced by a crew of five, including the driver of the towing vehicle. The mass of the installation, depending on the modification, does not exceed 1260 kg. The construction of the undercarriage allows you to tow it at speeds up to 70 km / h on the highway and not faster than 30 km / h on a dirt road.

Projects of the modernized anti-aircraft installations ZU-23 / 30М1-3 and ZU-23 / 30М1-4 were offered to customers at the end of the two thousandth. Soon there was information about the first purchases of such weapons. In the first half of 2011, deliveries of several types of Russian anti-aircraft systems to Venezuela began. A large contract involved the delivery of various missile and artillery systems, including the ZU-23 / 30М1-4 installations. According to the Venezuelan press, 300-like systems were ordered with the ability to use anti-aircraft missiles. The first samples of such weapons were transferred to the customer in May 2011 of the year.


Installation of the charger-23 / 30М1-4 at the parade in Venezuela


5 July 2011, on Independence Day, a military parade was held in Caracas. During this event, various models of weapons and equipment recently purchased by Venezuela were demonstrated. Among other samples, anti-aircraft installations ZU-23 / 30М1-4 were shown in towed version. Apparently, a technician participating in one of the first games took part in the parade.

Information about other contracts for the supply of anti-aircraft installations of the ZU-23 / 30М1 family is not yet available. Probably, while new buyers have not shown interest in these systems. Nevertheless, it can be expected that in the near future the Podolsk Electromechanical Plant PEMZ Spetsmash will receive new orders for such weapons. ZU-23 anti-aircraft guns and their modifications are in service with a large number of countries in the world that may be interested in upgrading or replacing them, but are not able to buy more sophisticated and sophisticated air defense systems.


On the materials of the sites:
http://pemz-podolsk.ru/
http://arms-expo.ru/
http://vestnik-rm.ru/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -8
    9 July 2015 06: 00
    Cool thing)), a budget option instead of "Shell", to combat tomahawks.
    1. +8
      9 July 2015 06: 37
      Beast Machine !!!
      Quote: warriordima
      Cool thing)), a budget option instead of "Shell", to combat tomahawks.

      Rather, to combat all sorts of small UAVs and helicopters.
      Although, there is nothing impossible in shooting down a tomahawk with this thing.
      1. Dam
        +8
        9 July 2015 11: 08
        I don’t really imagine how. The old tomahawk flies at a slow speed of 900km / h. The affected area is 3–4 km (2 in both directions), i.e. 4 km per minute. You need to know how, when and where it will fly, the operator must keep his hand on the trigger, and the trunks should be in the firing sector. So what a fantasy on the second floor. And so a good infantry fire reinforcement machine. Yes, I watched a military review of the work of the Shell. Even with their means of detection, it was not possible to shoot down the UAV from the cannon; I had to spend the rocket.
        1. +4
          9 July 2015 13: 03
          Quote: Damm
          I don’t really imagine how. The old tomahawk flies at a slow speed of 900km / h. The affected area is 3–4 km (2 in both directions), i.e. 4 km per minute.


          And, two "zushki" to apply, forgive that - "religion does not allow"?

          In this case, even with a minimum scenario, the operator has (3/900) * 3600 = 12 seconds to defeat.

          Agree, with trained calculation, the time for reaction is more than enough.

          Therefore, "In Yugoslavia they shot down ..." © (qwert)
          1. Dam
            +4
            9 July 2015 15: 47
            How difficult you are. Once again for those who are on an armored train: theoretically, you can shoot down from the Maidan slingshot. You just need to attach serious means of detection and target tracking automation. With planes and helicopters a little easier, they usually try to work in the process of shooting down an object where there is a key, therefore they are visible from far away and approach the scene themselves, or they fly by accident on other matters, but at a much lower speed. And about the two snows, Eureka! You came up with a new missile defense system. Stupidly we put the snags side-by-side along the borders, we arrange round-the-clock vigil of operators and not a single tomahawk will fly by!
            1. +3
              9 July 2015 21: 22
              theoretically, it is possible to shoot down from the Maidan slingshot.


              Matter of chance. A low-flying German Storch-class plane was blown up by a grenade thrown by someone at random from the ground.
              There was also an officially recorded fact of the destruction of an enemy aircraft in the air by a shot from a tank gun in February 1944 by the crew of the T-34-76 tank under the command of Alexander Mikhailovich Fadin.
              1. +4
                10 July 2015 00: 18
                combat192 SU  Today, 21: 22 ↑

                Sorry, I’ll add to your answer ,,,

                Alexander Mikhailovich recalled: “The plane cruised along this line and, knowing approximately the distance between the posts, I calculated its speed. It was small, on the order of 50-60 kilometers per hour. When the plane dropped the cargo and flew past us, I decided that if he will turn around, I’ll try to bring him down. I give Fetisov a command to unscrew the cap and charge it with fragmentation. The plane turns around, I take the lead - a shot. The shell hit him right in the engine, and the plane broke. "

                This does not happen on the battlefield every day, machine-gun points and armored personnel carriers are a common thing, but to shoot down a plane from a tank ?! But that was not all. As if a charmed T-34 notices movement 100 meters away from itself, and shoots the last shell at random in that direction. And from behind the smokescreen, German machine gunners, engulfed in flames, run out, and behind them a terrible explosion thunders - Fadin's shell set fire to the "Tiger", and the fire blew up the tank's ammunition.

                ,,, but what is interesting on the site "feat of the people", this fact does not appear in the awards, maybe I was looking badly hi
                http://www.rg.ru/2014/08/23/fedin-site.html
        2. 0
          9 July 2015 23: 55
          They didn’t shoot down an ax there, but a target plane.
        3. +5
          10 July 2015 18: 53
          Quote: Damm
          it was not possible to bring down the UAV from the gun

          An UAV is not a tomahawk.
          In Yugoslavia, in 1999, Tamogavki were shot down from similar installations: ZSU BOV-3. True, there are 3 pieces of 20-mm automatic cannons and are mounted on a "self-propelled cart", but this does not change the meaning, the sighting system there was weaker than the one installed on the ZU-23 / 30M1-4.

          Well, the fact that it is necessary to orient the zsu by sector to increase efficiency is clear to anyone who is interested in air defense issues.
          In addition, the article indicates that it is possible to work on the target from external sources of target designation.
        4. +2
          4 March 2016 18: 24
          The Iraqis worked out their tactics quite well, setting up posts along the span of missiles and knocked down most of them during the day, so the Yankees eventually switched to night shelling.
      2. +10
        9 July 2015 11: 17
        Quote: prosto_rgb
        Although, there is nothing impossible in shooting down a tomahawk with this thing.
        In Yugoslavia they shot down. Oddly enough, during low-altitude flights, it is precisely these MZA that pose the greatest danger to helicopter aircraft.
        1. +8
          9 July 2015 14: 09
          Well, dear, you fucking do not put your finger on it, in Yugoslavia "Shilki" distinguished themselves "and they" played "in command, mainly on the optical channel, with external target designation radar. In general, NATO then lost 96 aircraft in the air, probably also -2x23 they were hammering something, but their task was mainly to conduct a barrage in view of the very concept of the Czech "turtle", well, of course, operating on modern "elements".
          1. +2
            9 July 2015 19: 37
            over the last 30 years, the memory-23-2, in 90% of cases they were used, not for air targets, but for ground ...

            but, such a modernization ((work on ground targets))) 23-2 memory, NO ...
            1. +7
              9 July 2015 20: 04
              The ZU-23-2 was used primarily in ground battles of local wars, since its fire is extremely effective compared to any other type of weaponry of motorized rifles ...
              The memory can effectively suppress enemy firing points at a range of a direct shot (about 1000 m) ....
              most often this is required in fleeting combat clashes with irregular military formations, during counterinsurgency and counter-terrorism operations ....

              The Soviet army, widely used the ZU-23-2 in Afghanistan, the country's mountainous terrain determined the anti-aircraft installations a major role in protecting the supply routes from the attacks of the Afghan homeless .....
              "Shilcock" was not enough to solve such problems, therefore trucks with ZU-23-2, standing in bodies of unarmored trucks, were included in the composition of the transport convoys ... "GAZ-66", "ZIL-130", "ZIL- 131 "," Ural-375 ". ((The same happened in Chechnya 1,2,)))
              ZU-23-2 were actively used in Angola, Iran and Iraq during the Iran-Iraq, self-propelled self-propelled guns based on pickups were used in the war in Libya, now in the Donbass, Syria, Iraq, etc ...

              need, the modernization of the memory-23-2, for work, precisely on ground targets ...
            2. +1
              10 July 2015 19: 01
              Quote: cosmos111
              over the last 30 years, the memory-23-2, in 90% of cases they were used, not for air targets, but for ground ...

              but, such a modernization ((work on ground targets))) 23-2 memory, NO ...

              And what prevents the installation of a television / thermal imager / laser rangefinder and electric guidance in firing at ground targets?
          2. +1
            9 July 2015 19: 55
            Quote: Argon
            for sure, and ZU-2x23 for which something

            I didn’t shoot it down, just as the AK-74 or SVD didn’t shoot, the UA had their own analogues, which were exported. As for the tomahawks, I saw in the report only one case over night Belgrade and got no less than C-125 in it, here, in Iraq and anti-aircraft artillery fire, one, judging by the report, was littered but there if the memory serves me right either KS-19 (and this is automatic guidance, well, if it was in the battery), or S-60 or their Chinese clones, too lazy to look in YouTube for sure it has been preserved.
      3. 0
        9 July 2015 23: 51
        It strikes targets up to 200ms per second and needles up to 400ms.
        Subsonic axes and old zushki knocked them back in Yugoslavia.
        The subsonic ax is somewhere around 880km / h (maximum), and 400ms is about 1400-1500km / h, respectively 200ms is somewhere around 720km per hour, so it’s completely and given the fact that the axes just do not fly very high. Their main thing is to detect and aim, but with a thermal imager everything is simpler and there would still be a portable radar in a small area.
        1. 0
          10 July 2015 19: 06
          Quote: tilovaykrisa
          still a portable radar in a small area.

          Only if applied in local conflicts against partisans.
          Otherwise, the radar radiation will be copied by AWACS and others, and then covered with Shrikes. Of course, economically, it’s not very justified, considering the price of a shrike about $ 2 million apiece, but few people care about it in the war.
          Something like that. hi
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +12
    9 July 2015 06: 55
    ZU-23-2 was perfectly used for the defense of company (platoon) strong points from both the air and ground enemies (significantly increasing the firing capabilities of the unit). In a modernized version, this simple reliable anti-aircraft installation will increase its ability to defeat an air enemy. Yes, and ground in conditions of insufficient visibility using a thermal imager.
  4. +2
    9 July 2015 07: 36
    You will not say anything - a great upgrade !!
    1. +3
      9 July 2015 07: 54
      It remains to add a tower and tracks.
      1. +8
        9 July 2015 08: 12
        Did you serve in the army? Tower and caterpillars + 2 more barrels are ZSU 23-4 "Shilka"!
        1. +3
          9 July 2015 10: 03
          Quote: igorka357
          Did you serve in the army?

          I don't laugh in the circus, but I understand jokes and I advise everyone not to be serious all the time. (The "joke" emoticon was not printed in the first comment.)
      2. +2
        9 July 2015 08: 58
        Yes, there is such a machine based on MT-LB.
    2. +2
      9 July 2015 10: 09
      yes ... and where to get a suitable power source? Well, it’s good when the installation is on technology - but it is usually a surrogate! the installation was planned as an towed anti-aircraft gun ...
      Can you imagine how much the battery will weigh to rotate this thing? and the location of the generator in positions is generally out of the ordinary ...
      it’s good if it’s different - you don’t need to, except for those who are on technology ...
      1. +3
        9 July 2015 13: 05
        Ha ha So installing the APU on the tank is not out of the ordinary. A mini generator on the memory is out of the ordinary))) VERY funny.
        1. 0
          15 July 2015 10: 41
          what ha ha
          installing an APU on a tank has a specific purpose: saving the resource of an expensive tank engine ... FSE ...

          here we are talking about giving the installation, which was originally completely "manual" and towed, the properties of some kind of uber device ...

          as a result, the installation still does not compare in its performance with the ZSU-23-4 but its potential price will be wow ... nafig is not necessary ...
  5. +3
    9 July 2015 07: 47
    Cool thing, has not lost its relevance for half a century. Subject to modernization still serve.
    1. +1
      9 July 2015 10: 57
      in the dnr, such things were used to fight tanks from ambushes andryukha wrote that after the volley, the zu received at least 2 shots from the rpg
    2. 0
      4 March 2016 18: 30
      wrong sir. not half a century. I mean the idea itself.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +1
    9 July 2015 08: 10
    Wonderful setting! Which trucks just did not put.
  8. +1
    9 July 2015 09: 00
    Yes, ZUShka has changed a lot, now instead of the aiming and ZAP-23 computers, and even the Needles on the top of my head ... as I understand it, the calculation has decreased by one person, and the mass has increased, now it will be hard to drag her hands around the intersection. The ns used to have a drag standard of 3 km, I don’t remember the time, but they dragged it regularly.
  9. +6
    9 July 2015 09: 15
    These guns work very well against manpower, most often they work in this capacity in recent conflicts, for such conditions it would be possible to replace the Needles with something like the Cornet.
  10. +1
    9 July 2015 10: 15
    A new life for thousands standing in storage ZU-23-2.
  11. 0
    9 July 2015 10: 32
    With such optics and drives, it becomes an omnivorous weapon and 8km armored vehicles will sip and the sky under control is what you can do if you want, and not in scrap.
  12. AAV
    +2
    9 July 2015 10: 36
    Good article. Thanks to the author.
    But, interestingly, the Russian Defense Ministry showed interest in this modernization?
  13. +4
    9 July 2015 10: 43
    Quote: atos_kin
    It remains to add a tower and tracks.

    And it will be like in a joke:
    -Russian do not know how to make good cars.
    -Why we do not know how, we know how. Only we get them on tracks and with a gun.
  14. +4
    9 July 2015 11: 40
    Particularly pleased with the idea of ​​network organization of the battery. The only thing that depressed was the lack of a separate command post and external airborne surveillance tools (radar or lidar, with the possibility of placing them at a considerable distance from the positions of the guns and the command center)
  15. +3
    9 July 2015 12: 58
    And I was interested in the words, you can use a generator, or other equipment of a similar purpose. Can I use the sources found in everyday life? A set of car batteries, or a 220 V outlet?
  16. +7
    9 July 2015 13: 24
    Where I served (20 UR) we guys from such installations shot down rockets from hail. They launched as a target and the boys shot them down. The men were class specialists. At the same time conscripts. (1983-1985)
  17. 0
    9 July 2015 16: 58
    Quote: igorka357
    Did you serve in the army? Tower and caterpillars + 2 more barrels are ZSU 23-4 "Shilka"!


    No need to show your deliberate toughness and teeth. You are not the only owner of them on the site.
  18. +4
    9 July 2015 17: 17
    Another ersatz modernization, these art.automats are outdated 20 years ago. There is no money, I don’t want to raise new production ...
  19. +2
    9 July 2015 18: 41
    For defense against promising swarms of western UAVs - that's it!
    1. +1
      9 July 2015 21: 34
      ZU-23 from Iran where it is very loved and respected in particular, using not only as a means of air defense but also to support the ground forces, setting in this way.




    2. 0
      9 July 2015 21: 50
      Including those starting from the airfields of Bulgaria.
      1. +1
        9 July 2015 22: 55
        Do you know the size of the Black Sea, at least approximately? Who will run Roy small UAVs with 600 km ??? Teach at least the "basics, beeches and Vedas" of military science before writing such stupid comments.
        1. 0
          9 July 2015 23: 48
          I know the distance very well, so leave your mentor tone for anyone else.

          PS By the way, polite people respond to letters)
          1. +1
            10 July 2015 21: 45
            Stop joking with you, Vladimir! If you put your echidic commentary in an article on geopolitics, I would have endured it, pretending not to notice you. But to invent swarms of small UAVs flying out of our territory, only to annoy the Bulgarians, this is too much even for you.

            P.S. After your fair remark, I answered you.
  20. +2
    10 July 2015 14: 40
    I read about such a modernization of the ZU-23-2, in my opinion, the year before last. Pshek pans are produced and exported. With optoelectronic units, with mount for MANPADS units. So this modernization is our answer after. Unfortunately. sad
    1. with onist1
      -1
      11 July 2015 22: 52
      www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQwg2MupLGA victory weapons
    2. with onist1
      0
      11 July 2015 22: 52
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQwg2MupLGA
  21. with onist1
    -1
    11 July 2015 22: 51
    Quote: prosto_rgb
    Beast Machine !!!
    Quote: warriordima
    Cool thing)), a budget option instead of "Shell", to combat tomahawks.

    Rather, to combat all sorts of small UAVs and helicopters.
    Although, there is nothing impossible in shooting down a tomahawk with this thing.

    Quote: prosto_rgb
    Beast Machine !!!
    Quote: warriordima
    Cool thing)), a budget option instead of "Shell", to combat tomahawks.

    Rather, to combat all sorts of small UAVs and helicopters.
    Although, there is nothing impossible in shooting down a tomahawk with this thing.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQwg2MupLGA
  22. 0
    14 July 2015 16: 08
    I apologize, off topic, I have not found how to add news.
    An attempt was made to hack Patriot air defense systems, an article in English.
    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/08/german_hackers_hijack_missiles/
    In short, the NATO military noticed “inexplicable” orders that were remotely transmitted to missile systems consisting of six launchers and two radars.
    Unnamed hackers were able to carry out a successful attack and send commands to Patriot missiles manufactured in the USA and used by the German army. Missile launchers were located on the Turkish-Syrian border.