Eduard Limonov: "The history of Russia is ideology"

39
Eduard Limonov: "The history of Russia is ideology"


The writer told the “Russian Planet” about the need for social change, the ideology of Russia and the unwillingness of the elites to “put the dog” Ukraine
A publicist, a Russian political figure, the chairman of the party “The Other Russia” - this is not a complete list of the regalia of the Russian writer Eduard Limonov. Since December 2014, Limonov has refused to participate in political shows on television channels. “Such participation humiliated me,” the writer stresses. All the year he actively participates in the events in the Donbass - his associates from the “Interbrigade” fight in the ranks of the Republican Armed Forces and have military awards and certificates. Despite the fact that Limonov did not give an interview, he agreed to answer the questions of the “Russian Planet”.

- Eduard Veniaminovich, certain changes have taken place in our country since the state coup in Ukraine happened. The country is actually in a state of war. At the same time, political elites in the managerial and economic sector continue to conduct policies that do not correspond to the situation ...


“If in foreign policy a country now through time defends national interests, as exemplified by the reunification of Crimea with Russia, nothing has changed in the interior since our social system is liberal capitalism, with such a system, Chubais is appropriate for now.” It is not for nothing that Kudrin 11 has run the Russian economy for years and continues to be a close person to power. Therefore, it is necessary not to drive the government, but to change the line.

- But if we still follow the path of reforms, what could be the optimal reform of the executive branch from the position of Vladimir Putin? How to build state power in the current situation?


“Since Vladimir Putin remains the head of state and he is very popular, it’s senseless to dream of celestial potatoes, it’s pragmatic to assume that he is there, and maybe put him in a situation in which he will have to give up liberal capitalism ... After all, Putin was forced to reunite Crimea with Russia, because otherwise Russian citizens would have fallen in love with it inevitably.

“Ideology does not need to be looked for - it is originally”

- After the collapse of the Soviet Union, all state policy was aimed at appealing to the West. Now the situation is somewhat different, but we continue to fulfill international obligations, but is it necessary?


- No need to be utterly idiots, the West violates international obligations anytime and anywhere, as soon as there is a need. The West welcomed the USSR assassination with a wide and kind smile and applauded the reunification of Germany and the destruction of Yugoslavia; meanwhile, all these dramatic events completely contradicted the international covenants signed in Yalta and in Potsdam and tens and hundreds of smaller international agreements.

- Here you can make a kind of digression - after all, the Soviet Union had an ideology, but now there are obvious problems with this ...


History Russia is ideology. The concept of justice, which for centuries has replaced Russia with the concept of democracy, is our ideology. Our concept of justice includes a sharpened understanding of equality, which is why socialism has taken root in 70 years. The fact that we are the largest European nation (40% of the territory, 118 of millions of Russians live in Europe) is our ideology. That is, we have a set of basic data for Russia - they together form our ideology. So no need to look for her - it is there initially.

- Then how to dose and give this ideology? Will you help the state?


- I would help the Russian state, but I don’t want to help this power to build young people, it’s power I haven’t deserved it yet. Power understands only submission, as long as it continues, I will not come close to power. In this sense, it is quite unpleasant to me.

“The authorities allowed Crimea to reunite with Russia, because they understood that Russian citizens would be cursed if it did not”


- The case when Oleg Mironov was jailed for speaking out against the musician Makarevich scattered leaflets, of course, everyone has heard. Why is this happening? Is it not clear that the people despise Makarevich and support Mironov?


- This is the dictatorship of the law, because it was her as the principle of his future government that he declared during his first election as president Vladimir Putin. In other words - all the sisters in the face. Bay whites do not blush yet, beat red ones until they turn white. Unfair, yes, because by punishing Mironov, the power justifies Makarevich. This will adversely affect the friendliness of the government. Friendliness will lose. There will be a lot of questions to the authorities.


Oleg Mironov (center), accused of spraying pepper gas at the concert of Andrei Makarevich, during the examination of the motion of the investigation to extend the arrest in the Zamoskvoretsky court


Oleg Mironov (center), accused of spraying pepper gas at the concert of Andrei Makarevich, during the examination of the motion of the investigation to extend the arrest in the Zamoskvoretsky court. Photo: Valery Sharifulin / TASS
In addition to the Mironov case, there is a deportation initiated by the Kremlin from members of the Other Russia party from Donetsk. This is also repression, although not in the territory of the Russian Federation. Thinking quite vile here manifests itself - “Fight, turn your dears yourself for the freedom of Donbass, but to engage in party activities, we will not give you ...”.

- Nevertheless, you think that when a state is at war, you need to rally around the state. How do you rate our foreign policy?


“The authorities of the Russian Federation allowed Crimea to reunite with Russia because they understood that Russian citizens would be cursed if it did not.” Now, in the case of Donbass, the authorities want to get rid of the problem and somehow manipulate the horse and quivering doe together - Kiev and the DPR-LPR. It will not work, for it is unnatural, and thousands of corpses will not allow reconciliation, believe my experience. So they press reverse, and where we press, they don’t want to press there.

- Part of society openly calls on the president to send troops. Now we observe the Minsk agreements. What will happen next is also vaguely presented. You once talked about the collapse of Ukraine ...


- It is already enough to call, everything is said, who wanted to hear - I heard ... It is possible to divide the Ukrainian empire by persuading Poland, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia to make claims to their territories now belonging to the Ukrainian Empire. The Russian government, I note, does not. I think, does not believe in success. Need to believe. The war and so, and so it goes, and Russian participate in it, volunteers and those who should participate, according to the authorities. After all, there are absolutely no prerequisites for peace in the Donbas. A year ago, a quick blitzkrieg of the Russian army in Kiev was needed. Today it is unlikely to help. But we still win. Be bold, GDP!
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    16 June 2015 18: 21
    Anarchist is shorter!
    1. +1
      16 June 2015 18: 37
      His boat left after the current (for EBN ..) ..Tries to return, but in vain! hi Now the format of another begins!
    2. +14
      16 June 2015 18: 47
      What is an anarchist? What do you mean? He calls to destroy the state?
      Remove the Red Banner. It does not go to you. Especially with such a nickname. Barboskin under the banner of the Soviet Union. You can be stunned.
      I am ashamed of those on this site. I swear, I will still write an article with a request to transfer me to lieutenant colonels. Against the background of people like you, I have a lot of it. Fu
      I do not put a minus. It hurts fat to stoop to this.
  2. 0
    16 June 2015 18: 26
    "It's me, Edechka." That says it all.
    1. +4
      16 June 2015 18: 37
      Quote: st25310
      "It's me, Edechka." That says it all.

      "It's me Eddie", more precisely. I read it - disgusting. But in this matter he is right about something, probably a year. But an anarchist, aged.
      1. +8
        16 June 2015 18: 46
        Quote: Kos_kalinki9
        Quote: st25310
        "It's me, Edechka." That says it all.

        "It's me Eddie", more precisely. I read it - disgusting. But in this matter he is right about something, probably a year. But an anarchist, aged.


        I completely agree, especially on "It's me, Eddie" ...

        However, the years have played their part, and here is what we can agree with: "when the state is at war, you need to rally around the state"...

        PS Well, by the way, the National Bolsheviks in the Baltic states and the US base made their way with the Russian flag and leaflets ...
        1. +4
          16 June 2015 18: 52
          It is really necessary to unite, but for nat.balls, as I understand it, Russia comes first, the rest is secondary.
        2. +1
          17 June 2015 10: 36
          Well, "Eddie" is youth ... And then all the same - the evolution of a revolutionary! Not only "Eddie" can be read - google it ...

          (And so, in general: who does not agree that anarchy is the mother of order?
          When is anarchy not anarchy, but "local power", the rule of the people, self-government? direct democracy!
          ... that which the party bosses in China were wildly afraid of during the "cultural revolution", and even more so - our "party elites"; what the current Chinese "socialist capitalists" ate Bo Xilai for ... So Limonov - quite a "jiaofan" - the ideologist of the Cultural Revolution! you can't refuse culture!)
      2. +1
        16 June 2015 19: 56
        Have you read "We Had a Great Era"?
        1. 0
          16 June 2015 20: 18
          Quote: vladim.gorbunow
          Have you read "We Had a Great Era"?

          No. And worth it?
    2. +1
      16 June 2015 18: 53
      What is said? Here I do not digest non-traditional men. But what's wrong with the article?
      What!
      See my comms. higher and lower.
      1. +2
        16 June 2015 22: 40
        The whole article is all that’s, but as Solzhenitsyn wrote: It’s necessary to say not what you’ll do (you yourself, maybe you don’t know, it will be visible there), but what your interlocutor is reassuring now. And not to direct the head to theory, it still didn’t help anyone (you can tell the theory later), but to constantly think: with whom are you on the way and to which pillar. And patriotism should be without fanaticism (we all remember Ukrainian patriots - they are children). And I also know cases of fanaticism in Orthodoxy and prosperous families (I myself am Orthodox) collapsed on this basis.
        1. +1
          16 June 2015 23: 04
          And then there is Boris Mironov with his book The Sentence to Kill Russia. When I read it, at the beginning of this millennium I completely agreed with him. But years later, I can’t understand whether Putin took into account the criticism, or whether Mironov ran ahead of the engine smoke.
  3. +6
    16 June 2015 18: 30
    My patriot of Lemons. The authorities made a rogue patriot.
  4. -2
    16 June 2015 18: 32
    Has anyone read his opus "It's Me, Eddie"? Rare muck. And this miracle gives us advice?
    1. 0
      16 June 2015 18: 47
      Quote: Ilotan
      Has anyone read his opus "It's Me, Eddie"?



      Honestly, I still do not understand the members of his party: after such an opus, to go after such a leader ???

      Although they won for Lyazhko in Ukraine ...
      1. +6
        16 June 2015 20: 51
        I did not read, but I know that all Nashi are far from the National Bolsheviks, in real actions, in support of Russia and its people. And what Limonov said in the article is absolutely true. I don’t understand what this ancient opus has to do with it.
        1. -2
          16 June 2015 21: 30
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          I don’t understand what this ancient opus has to do with it.



          You need to read it ... And then you can already have some opinion about this "opus" ...
          1. +3
            16 June 2015 22: 42
            But I don’t give a damn about him (opus), an article on a completely different topic that really interests me, unlike the 40-year-old writings
          2. +3
            16 June 2015 23: 31
            Quote: veksha50
            You need to read it ... And then you can already have some opinion about this "opus" ...

            And you need to read his thoughts and speeches of recent years .. and accept the fact that a person can change over time, and in connection with events in life. What can you object to a specific article?
            Ask the corsair - he will tell you for sure what is happening in our government.
            But with this
            A year ago, we needed a quick blitzkrieg of the Russian army in Kiev. Today it is unlikely to help.
            I absolutely agree, and wrote the same a year ago.
            what although in other words .. lol
            1. 0
              17 June 2015 08: 58
              Quote: avia1991
              What can you object to a specific article?



              You read my comments carefully - and then you will understand that it is against the current article that I have nothing and fully support it ...

              And here is the right to express their attitude about his "valiant" quirks with gomosyatskimi afroniggerami - have ...

              It turns out that I am making excuses for his "childhood illness" ??? Or do you support him as LYAZHko ???
            2. +1
              17 June 2015 10: 45
              Is the Limonka newspaper still out? ...
          3. 0
            17 June 2015 12: 14
            Quote: veksha50
            You need to read it ... And then you can already have some opinion about this "opus" ...


            This is someone razminuvalsya ??? Who has not read the opus - still voting for tolerance and homosexuality ???

            Be sure to read ...

            PS To understand my position - imagine the following ...

            She just behind the scenes of ... well, loved him afronigger of the Kama Sutra ...

            The speaker shook himself, climbed out of the backstage to the pedestal, and began to speak in front of the audience about how to move towards a brighter future ...

            So how is it???
  5. +2
    16 June 2015 18: 35
    Lemon fellow, he’s saying everything right!
    1. -2
      17 June 2015 05: 53
      he says correctly, but why did the black man suck?
      1. 0
        17 June 2015 19: 25
        Quote: zoknyay82
        he says correctly, but why did the black man suck?

        Did you hold a candle ????
  6. +5
    16 June 2015 18: 41
    I do not agree with everything. But, the article put a plus. All theses expressed should be carefully thought out and taken to action. I have lived 20 years in Ukraine and I know for sure that between the South-East and the West of Ukraine there has never been and never will be friendliness and especially brotherhood, especially after all the bedlam that has been going on over the past year.
    1. +2
      16 June 2015 22: 02
      Quote: konvalval
      I have lived 20 years in Ukraine and I know for sure that between the South-East and the West of Ukraine there has never been and never will be friendliness and especially brotherhood, especially after all the bedlam that has been going on over the past year.

      -----------------------
      Limonov is also a Kharkov resident ...
  7. +12
    16 June 2015 18: 42
    Lemons, as a politician, began as a rare der. So what? Saul also persecuted Christians, and then became the apostle Paul. Many of you can, like Lemons, go to the bullpen and the detention center for an idea?

    So Lemons are right? Wrong? Write essentially. Respect yourself. Put a plus article.

    Guys! Well, respect yourself!
    hi soldier
    1. +7
      16 June 2015 19: 07
      Quote: My address
      Lemons, as a politician, began as a rare der. So what? Saul also persecuted Christians, and then became the apostle Paul. Many of you can, like Lemons, go to the bullpen and the detention center for an idea?

      So Lemons are right? Wrong? Write essentially. Respect yourself. Put a plus article.

      Guys! Well, respect yourself!
      hi soldier

      I completely agree with you. "Who among you is sinless, let him be the first to throw a stone at her" (Gospel of John Ch.8, Article 7). Article plus, Limonov's position in this situation is a plus.
      1. +4
        16 June 2015 19: 25
        Someone minusanul, but there is nothing to argue. Probably a liberal.
    2. -5
      16 June 2015 21: 10
      Quote: My address
      Lemons, as a politician, began as a rare der. So what? Saul also persecuted Christians, and then became the apostle Paul. Many of you can, like Lemons, go to the bullpen and the detention center for an idea?

      So Lemons are right? Wrong? Write essentially. Respect yourself. Put a plus article.

      Guys! Well, respect yourself!


      Politics in essence der.mo. Limonov non-exclusion. In essence, remained the same as it was.
      You recall the fate of those who decided to change the world map? For example, Hitler. This national Bolshevik (which in fact does not fit in any logic) decided to go the same way, hiding behind patriotism.
  8. -1
    16 June 2015 18: 52
    "Alas" and "Ah"! The ward of "Clio" writes her script, different from the templates, and the greater the discrepancy between the "phrases" of the media and the real world, the greater the resonance in an active society. fool Is it worth mentioning that this is the path to no where!
  9. +4
    16 June 2015 18: 55
    Eduard Limonov: "The history of Russia is ideology"... one cannot disagree with this .. From myself I would say so -You need to believe in Russia .. as a postulate of ideology ..
    .................................................. ......................
    About Limonov ... as a writer, I don’t know .. I don’t like him, his poems are still nothing, but the prose is not mine .... As a poet, Makarevich also liked many people, but at a difficult time for the country, which of them is a patriot of Russia ..?
  10. +5
    16 June 2015 18: 59
    And in this case I agree with him. I haven't read "It's Me, Eddie". But whatever he wrote there, this is not a reason to stick a label for life. People change. Makarevich is mentioned in the article, he was popular, he sang songs. And now?
  11. -7
    16 June 2015 20: 10
    There was a lemon g ... s, and remained so! It will not be suitable for the upbringing (building) of young people - it will be tantalizing that they will tap on a lemon.
    1. +4
      16 June 2015 20: 42
      Quote: Dmitrij Volodin
      There was a lemon g ... s, and remained so! It will not be suitable for the upbringing (building) of young people - it will be tantalizing that they will tap on a lemon.

      Well, to call a person like that, you need good reason. Tell me, what trace do you leave after yourself? You probably created a party and headed it, you wrote several books (albeit scandalous) and published them, you emigrated from the USSR to the states because of disagreement with the CPSU, and then got closer to the American and then to the French socialists? if this is all about you then your comment is correct, if not, sorry you are wrong.
  12. 0
    16 June 2015 20: 13
    Limonov is a Russian writer? belay Oh yes! Memento "I am Eddie" about a connection with a black Frenchman, written in France. And who drove him there? Then the "great" YouTube video with one mattress for two with Shenderovich. His own parody of Don Quixote and the untied revolutionary anarchist. On that and trades. laughing
    1. +5
      16 June 2015 20: 43
      In this article, E. Limonov is right. For some time now I have not confused the state with the Motherland. Is it normal when on the "Q&A days" to the GDP there are 3 million of its vassals in line? No, that means the state!
      1. +3
        16 June 2015 23: 36
        Quote: Svyatoslav
        For some time now I have not confused the state with the Motherland.

        good Well said!
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. +1
    17 June 2015 10: 43
    In any case, he is right in one thing - the structure of the government must be changed!